Differences in hemodynamic response to vasodilation due to calcium channel antagonism with nifedipine and direct-acting agonism with hydralazine in chronic refractory congestive heart failure
- 1 July 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 54 (1) , 126-131
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(84)90316-3
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of calcium-mediated vasoconstriction in chronic congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Acute hemodynamic effect of oral nifedipine in severe chronic congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- Oral Nifedipine in the Long-Term Management of Severe Chronic Heart FailureJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1982
- Acute hemodynamic responses to sublingual nifedipine: dependence on left ventricular function.Circulation, 1982
- Use of nifedipine in older patients and patients with congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: Nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Unpredictable response to nifedipine in severe cardiac failure.BMJ, 1980
- Hemodynamic effects of nifedipine in congestive heart failureThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1980
- Haemodynamic effects of nifedipine in heart failure.Heart, 1980
- Clinical use of a calcium antagonistic agent (nifedipine) in acute pulmonary edemaThe American Journal of Medicine, 1979