A Review of Diagnostic Inaccuracy
- 1 October 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medicine, Science and the Law
- Vol. 35 (4) , 347-351
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002580249503500413
Abstract
A review is presented of autopsy evidence demonstrating clinical diagnostic inaccuracy. Startling results emerge: the major clinical diagnosis is not confirmed in up to 45 per cent of cases, with typical error rates of up to 30 per cent; autopsy reveals unexpected major findings in up to 33 per cent of cases; management should have been different in up to 24 per cent of cases; clinicians cannot identify which patients are likely to have errant diagnoses; clinically ‘certain’ diagnoses still have a high error rate. These error rates have not changed significantly since an early study in 1912 despite the current widespread use of advanced investigation modalities.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer-aided decision support in clinical medicineInternational Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 1989
- Diagnostic Yield of the Autopsy in a University Hospital and a Community HospitalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- The Problematic Death CertificateNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- The Value of the Autopsy in Three Medical ErasNew England Journal of Medicine, 1983
- Computers in Medicine: A survey of decision aids for cliniciansBMJ, 1982
- A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: II. Analysis of inaccuracies in clinical diagnoses and their significanceThe Journal of Pathology, 1981
- A prospective study of 1152 hospital autopsies: I. Inaccuracies in death certificationThe Journal of Pathology, 1981
- Clinical information system for junior doctorsInternational Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 1980
- Quality Assessment in Hypertension: Analysis of Process and Outcome MethodsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Channel capacity in absolute judgment tasks: An artifact of information bias?Psychological Bulletin, 1970