Mandatory State-Based Error-Reporting Systems: Current and Future Prospects
- 1 November 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in American Journal of Medical Quality
- Vol. 20 (6) , 297-303
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860605281850
Abstract
The magnitude of medical errors documented in the 1999 Institute of Medicine report To Err Is Human encouraged health care leaders across the country to evaluate and improve current systems of care. To aid in this effort, the authors recommended and provided guidelines for establishing state-based mandatory error-reporting systems. This repository for medical errors would allow experts to categorize, trend, and analyze data, generating institutional responsibility and increasing knowledge about medical mistakes. To be effective, these systems must employ efficient data collection methods, techniques for analysis, and feedback mechanisms. They must also engage institutional leaders in fostering a culture of safety and encourage multidisciplinary collaboration to learn from mistakes and improve microsystem-level processes. A review of current systems reveals extreme variation across states in each of these areas. However, initial successes do exist, suggesting the true potential of these systems and the need for continued evaluation as systems progress in future efforts.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Error Reporting and Disclosure SystemsJAMA, 2005
- Using Information to Empower Nurse Managers to Become Champions for Patient SafetyNursing Administration Quarterly, 2005
- Does Full Disclosure of Medical Errors Affect Malpractice Liability? The Jury Is Still OutThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 2003
- Reporting of Adverse EventsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Evidence on interventions to reduce medical errorsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Why error reporting systems should be voluntaryBMJ, 2000