Comparative Politics and Public Finance

Preprint
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
    • preprint
      • Published in RePEc
Abstract
We present a model of electoral accountability to compare the public finance outcomes under a presidential-congressional and a parliamentary system. In a presidential-congressional system, contrary to a parliamentary system, there are no endogenous incentives for legislative cohesion, but this allows for a clearer separation of powers. These features lead to clear differences in the public finance performance of the two systems. A Parliamentary system has redistribution towards a majority, less underprovision of public goods, more waste and a higher burden of taxation, whereas a presidential-congressional system has redistribution towards a minority, more underprovision of public goods, but less waste and a smaller size of government. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
All Related Versions

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: