gp100 Peptide Vaccine and Interleukin-2 in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Top Cited Papers
- 2 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 364 (22) , 2119-2127
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1012863
Abstract
Stimulating an immune response against cancer with the use of vaccines remains a challenge. We hypothesized that combining a melanoma vaccine with interleukin-2, an immune activating agent, could improve outcomes. In a previous phase 2 study, patients with metastatic melanoma receiving high-dose interleukin-2 plus the gp100:209-217(210M) peptide vaccine had a higher rate of response than the rate that is expected among patients who are treated with interleukin-2 alone. We conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial involving 185 patients at 21 centers. Eligibility criteria included stage IV or locally advanced stage III cutaneous melanoma, expression of HLA*A0201, an absence of brain metastases, and suitability for high-dose interleukin-2 therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 alone (720,000 IU per kilogram of body weight per dose) or gp100:209-217(210M) plus incomplete Freund's adjuvant (Montanide ISA-51) once per cycle, followed by interleukin-2. The primary end point was clinical response. Secondary end points included toxic effects and progression-free survival. The treatment groups were well balanced with respect to baseline characteristics and received a similar amount of interleukin-2 per cycle. The toxic effects were consistent with those expected with interleukin-2 therapy. The vaccine–interleukin-2 group, as compared with the interleukin-2–only group, had a significant improvement in centrally verified overall clinical response (16% vs. 6%, P=0.03), as well as longer progression-free survival (2.2 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7 to 3.9 vs. 1.6 months; 95% CI, 1.5 to 1.8; P=0.008). The median overall survival was also longer in the vaccine–interleukin-2 group than in the interleukin-2–only group (17.8 months; 95% CI, 11.9 to 25.8 vs. 11.1 months; 95% CI, 8.7 to 16.3; P=0.06). In patients with advanced melanoma, the response rate was higher and progression-free survival longer with vaccine and interleukin-2 than with interleukin-2 alone. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00019682.)This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Survival with Ipilimumab in Patients with Metastatic MelanomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Sipuleucel-T Immunotherapy for Castration-Resistant Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Tumor-reactive CD4+ T cells develop cytotoxic activity and eradicate large established melanoma after transfer into lymphopenic hostsThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2010
- Tumor-Infiltrating FOXP3+ T Regulatory Cells Show Strong Prognostic Significance in Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- CTLA-4 blockade increases IFNγ-producing CD4 + ICOS hi cells to shift the ratio of effector to regulatory T cells in cancer patientsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma Using Interleukin-2 Alone or in Conjunction with VaccinesClinical Cancer Research, 2008
- Three Phase II Cytokine Working Group Trials of gp100 (210M) Peptide Plus High-Dose Interleukin-2 in Patients With HLA-A2–Positive Advanced MelanomaJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Less Yin, More Yang: Confronting the Barriers to Cancer ImmunotherapyClinical Cancer Research, 2007
- Checkpoint Blockade in Cancer ImmunotherapyPublished by Elsevier ,2006
- Immunologic and Clinical Outcomes of Vaccination With a Multiepitope Melanoma Peptide Vaccine Plus Low-Dose Interleukin-2 Administered Either Concurrently or on a Delayed ScheduleJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004