Analysis of method-comparison data
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
- Vol. 14 (1) , 92-96
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00566.x
Abstract
Method-comparison studies, in which new 'candidate' techniques are compared with an established 'gold standard', feature commonly in optometric research. Investigators often analyse their findings using least squares regression, Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient and the paired t-test. We describe more appropriate methods which include: the 'limits of agreement', the intraclass correlation coefficient, and Deming's method for estimating a straight line fit. Comparisons between methods are made with the aid of a computer simulation. Computer program listings are provided to assist in implementing the analyses.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of a new non-contact tonometer with Goldmann applanationEye, 1989
- Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variableComputers in Biology and Medicine, 1989
- Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurementsOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1988
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Calculation of slope by Deming's method from least-squares regression coefficients and imprecision.Clinical Chemistry, 1984
- A clinical evaluation of the Nidek AutorefractorOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1984
- Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison StudiesJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 1983
- Linear regression analysis by Deming's method.Clinical Chemistry, 1980
- A NEW VIEW OF INTER‐OBSERVER AGREEMENT1Personnel Psychology, 1963