Risk-appraisal, outcome and self-efficacy expectancies: Cognitive factors in preventive behaviour related to cancer
- 1 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology & Health
- Vol. 4 (2) , 99-109
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449008408144
Abstract
Health education often attempts to influence or persuade through risk-appraisal of impending danger or harm. Risk: appraisal implies cognitive processes concerning the severity of the threatening event and the probability of its occurrence. In two studies we investigated whether risk factors could adequately predict preventive behaviour with respect to cancer. The tint study concerned the health belief model. the second study the protection motivation theory. Protection motivation theory includes the health belief factors but also self-efficacy expectancy. The most important finding is that risk-appraisal does not predict preventive behaviour adequately: outcome expectancy and self-efficacy expectancy should be included in the prediction of preventive behaviour. In general, our findings suggest the superiority of the protection motivation theory to the health belief model in predicting preventive behaviour with respect to cancer.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attitude Change in a Realistic Experiment: The Effect of Party Membership and Audience Reaction During an Interview With a Dutch Politician1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1987
- Perceptions of CancerJournal of Psychosocial Oncology, 1986
- Psychosocial aspects of changes in cigarette-smoking behaviorPatient Education and Counseling, 1985
- Driving While Under the Influence of Alcohol: Relationship to Attitudes and Beliefs in a College PopulationThe American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 1981
- IntroductionHealth Education Monographs, 1974