Indexes of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip and Knee:Validation–Value in Comparison with Other Assessment Tests
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology
- Vol. 16 (sup65) , 85-89
- https://doi.org/10.3109/03009748709102182
Abstract
The index of severity for hip disease (ISH) was established, validated and appraised as a new assessment test for the trial of new drugs as well as for long-term follow-up of patients, and to help with future indications for surgery. The ISH deals with pain, maximum walking distance, and some activities of daily living. Inter-observer reproducibility is good (mean deviation 0.55 points; p < 0.05). In a short-term, double-blind crossover trial, the ISH, judged according to its power to distinguish between the active drug period and the placebo period, appears as one of the best assessment tests. In the long term, total hip prosthesis is most often justified when the ISH score reaches 10–12 points. The index of severity for knee disease (ISK) was validated and appraised by the same statistical methods. Its value in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or analgesic trials is lower than the value of the ISH. However, its use is still justified for that purpose, and for long-term follow-up of osteoarthritis of the knee.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Total replacement of the kneeThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1979
- A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prosthesesJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1976
- HIP ASSESSMENT: A COMPARISON OF NINE DIFFERENT METHODSThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1972