Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer
- 1 January 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychiatric Association Publishing in American Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 142 (1) , 34-39
- https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.142.1.34
Abstract
Forty-six patients who underwent modified radical mastectomy were compared 14 months after surgery with 21 patients who underwent lumpectomy and radiation; all patients had stage I or II breast cancer. Lumpectomy patients reported less of a loss of feelings of attractiveness and femininity, were less self-conscious about their appearance, received more emotional support from friends, and were more open about their surgery and sexual feelings after surgery. Unlike the mastectomy patients, they saw their spouses' sexuality as enhanced after surgery. Lumpectomy patients were not less anxious or less depressed but showed better overall adaptation to their surgery and less functional change.This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of the psychological effects of breast-saving procedure with the modified radical mastectomyCancer, 1981
- Comparing Radical Mastectomy with Quadrantectomy, Axillary Dissection, and Radiotherapy in Patients with Small Cancers of the BreastNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Psychosocial correlates of breast cancer and its treatments.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- A Diagnostic InterviewArchives of General Psychiatry, 1978
- Psychological and social adjustment to mastectomy.A two-year follow-up studyCancer, 1977
- PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF MASTECTOMY ON A WOMANʼS FEMININE SELF-CONCEPTJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1977
- Sex therapy and mastectomyJournal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1975
- An Inventory for Measuring DepressionArchives of General Psychiatry, 1961
- Psychological impact of cancer and its treatment.IV. Adaptation to radical mastectomyCancer, 1955
- PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF ADJUSTMENT TO CANCER OF THE BREASTPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1952