Linear-Quadratic Approximation and Value-Function Iteration: A Comparison
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
- Vol. 8 (1) , 99-113
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1990.10509780
Abstract
This article studies the accuracy of two versions of Kydland and Prescott's (1980, 1982) procedure for approximating optimal decision rules in problems in which the objective fails to be quadratic and the constraints fail to be linear. The analysis is carried out using a version of the Brock–Mirman (1972) model of optimal economic growth. Although the model is not linear quadratic, its solution can, nevertheless, be computed with arbitrary accuracy using a variant of existing value-function iteration procedures. I find that the Kydland–Prescott approximate decision rules are very similar to those implied by value-function iteration.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why does inventory investment fluctuate so much?Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988
- Production, growth and business cyclesJournal of Monetary Economics, 1988
- Straight time and overtime in equilibriumJournal of Monetary Economics, 1988
- On the superneutrality of money in a stochastic dynamic macroeconomic modelJournal of Monetary Economics, 1987
- Optimal Replacement of GMC Bus Engines: An Empirical Model of Harold ZurcherEconometrica, 1987
- Indivisible labor and the business cycleJournal of Monetary Economics, 1985
- The equity premium: A puzzleJournal of Monetary Economics, 1985
- Real Business CyclesJournal of Political Economy, 1983
- Time to Build and Aggregate FluctuationsEconometrica, 1982
- Optimal economic growth and uncertainty: The discounted caseJournal of Economic Theory, 1972