Many Children Left Behind? Textbooks and Test Scores in Kenya
Top Cited Papers
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Journal: Applied Economics
- Vol. 1 (1) , 112-135
- https://doi.org/10.1257/app.1.1.112
Abstract
A randomized evaluation in rural Kenya finds, contrary to the previous literature, that providing textbooks did not raise average test scores. Textbooks did increase the scores of the best students (those with high pretest scores) but had little effect on other students. Textbooks are written in English, most students' third language, and many students could not use them effectively. More generally, the curriculum in Kenya, and in many other developing countries, tends to be oriented toward academically strong students, leaving many students behind in societies that combine a centralized educational system; the heterogeneity in student preparation associated with rapid educational expansion; and disproportionate elite power. (JEL O15, I21, I28, J13)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in IndiaThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2007
- What education production functions really show: a positive theory of education expendituresEconomics of Education Review, 1999
- Raising School Effects While Ignoring Culture? Local Conditions and the Influence of Classroom Tools, Rules, and PedagogyReview of Educational Research, 1994
- Improving elementary mathematics education in Nicaragua: An experimental study of the impact of textbooks and radio on achievement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981