Comparison of computed tomography and conventional cystography for detection of traumatic bladder rupture
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Urologic Radiology
- Vol. 12 (1) , 188-193
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02924005
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is the method of choice for evaluating patients with blunt abdominal and/or pelvic trauma. However, the sensitivity of CT for detecting bladder ruptures has been questioned. We reviewed both the conventional cystograms and the CT examinations of 25 patients who had both studies as the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal and pelvic trauma in the last 5 years. Five of these 25 patients had bladder ruptures, three extraperitoneal and two intraperitoneal. All five injuries were detected by both CT and conventional cystography. In one patient the conventional cystogram was falsely positive. In this case the correct diagnosis was made by CT, and a repeat cystogram confirmed that no bladder injury was present. Our results indicate that CT, if properly performed, is as sensitive for detection of bladder injuries as conventional cystography.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- CT Cystography in the Evaluation of Bladder TraumaJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 1990
- The value of CT in the detection of bladder and posterior urethral injuriesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1989
- Computerized tomography in diagnosis of bladder ruptureUrology, 1989
- Computerized Tomography in Bladder Rupture: Diagnostic LimitationsJournal of Urology, 1987
- Prospective Study of Computed Tomography in Initial Management of Blunt Abdominal TraumaPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1986
- Bladder injury in blunt pelvic trauma.Radiology, 1986
- Radiologic diagnosis of extrarenal genitourinary traumaUrologic Radiology, 1985
- Genitourinary traumaUrologic Radiology, 1985