What Quality Improvement Professionals Need to Know About IRBs
- 1 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal for Healthcare Quality
- Vol. 25 (4) , 4-9
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2003.tb01067.x
Abstract
Healthcare quality improvement (QI) studies are systematic analyses of processes and outcomes. As such, they meet one of the federal regulatory criteria defining research. They also meet the second criterion in many instances, generalizability of findings, even if it was not the study's original intent. Therefore, to err on the side of patients' rights, any studies involving human subjects or human data must be approved by federally mandated institutional review boards (IRBs) or their designees. This article explores federal regulations to protect research subjects, levels of IRB review, and strategies to simplify the IRB approval process and discusses implications for QI studies.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Relationship Between Continuous Quality Improvement and ResearchJournal for Healthcare Quality, 2002
- When is informed consent appropriate in educational research?: regulatory and ethical issues.IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 2002
- The Quality Improvement–Research Divide and the Need for External OversightAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2001
- Determining When Quality Improvement Initiatives Should Be Considered ResearchJAMA, 2000
- Ethical aspects of human experimentation in health services researchJAMA, 1991