Comparison between Pernasal Flocked Swabs and Nasopharyngeal Aspirates for Detection of Common Respiratory Viruses in Samples from Children
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Vol. 46 (7) , 2414-2417
- https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00369-08
Abstract
In this prospective study we compared the use of pernasal flocked swab samples with the use of nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) samples for the detection of respiratory viruses from 455 children less than 5 years of age. Overall, the sensitivity and the specificity of the pernasal flocked swab samples were 98.5% and 100%, respectively. The excellent sensitivity of the flocked swab samples in combination with the rapid means by which they may be collected makes them an alternative to NPA samples, whose collection is more invasive.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in childrenJournal of Clinical Virology, 2008
- High Rate of Human Bocavirus and Adenovirus Coinfection in Hospitalized Israeli ChildrenJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Diagnostic Assays for Respiratory Syncytial Virus DiseaseThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2007
- Antivirals for influenza: Historical perspectives and lessons learnedAntiviral Research, 2006
- Comparison of Flocked and Rayon Swabs for Collection of Respiratory Epithelial Cells from Uninfected Volunteers and Symptomatic PatientsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2006
- RSV testing in bronchiolitis: which nasal sampling method is best?Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2005
- Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for Detection and Differentiation of Influenza Viruses A and B during the 2001-2002 Influenza Season in IsraelJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2005
- Simultaneous Detection, Subgrouping, and Quantitation of Respiratory Syncytial Virus A and B by Real-Time PCRJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Nasal Swab versus Nasopharyngeal Aspirate for Isolation of Respiratory VirusesJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Comparison of nasal brush and nasopharyngeal aspirate techniques in obtaining specimens for detection of respiratory syncytial viral antigen by immunofluorescenceThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1989