A Trial for Comparing Methods for Eliciting Treatment Preferences From Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer
- 1 October 2000
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medical Care
- Vol. 38 (10) , 1040-1050
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200010000-00008
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the convergent validity of 3 types of utility measures: standard gamble, time tradeoff, and rating scale. A prospective cohort of 120 men with advanced prostate cancer were first asked to rank order 8 health states, and then utility values were obtained from each participant for each of the 8 health states through 2 of the 3 techniques evaluated (standard gamble, time tradeoff and rating scale). Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 possible pairs of techniques. The validity of the 3 methods, as measured by the convergence and raw score differences of the techniques, was assessed with ANOVA. The ability of the techniques to differentiate health states was determined. The inconsistencies between rankings and utility values were also measured. Proportions of illogical utility responses were assessed as the percent of times when states with more symptoms were given higher or equal utility values than states with fewer symptoms. There were significant differences in raw scores between techniques, but the values were correlated across health states. Utility values were often inconsistent with the rank order of health states. In addition, utility assessment did not differentiate the health states as well as the rank order. Furthermore, utility values were often illogical in that states with more symptoms received equal or higher utility values than states with fewer symptoms. Use of the utility techniques in cost-effectiveness analysis and decision making has been widely recommended. The results of this study raise serious questions as to the validity and usefulness of the measures.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Confidence Intervals for Individual Utilities:Medical Decision Making, 1997
- Standard gamble, time trade-off and rating scale: Experimental results on the ranking properties of QALYsJournal of Health Economics, 1997
- Variation in Patient Utilities for Outcomes of the Management of Chronic Stable AnginaJAMA, 1995
- Minimum Data Needed on Patient Preferences for Accurate, Efficient Medical Decision MakingMedical Care, 1995
- A Method for Estimating the Cost- Effectiveness of Incorporating Patient Preferences into Practice GuidelinesMedical Decision Making, 1994
- A Decision Analysis of Streptokinase plus Heparin as Compared with Heparin Alone for Deep-Vein ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisalJournal of Health Economics, 1986
- Preferences for Health OutcomesMedical Decision Making, 1984
- Speech and SurvivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniquesSocio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1976