Decentralisation of Pay In the Nhs: Diagnosis and Prognosis
- 30 January 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Human Resource Management Journal
- Vol. 6 (1) , 49-62
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1996.tb00396.x
Abstract
This article analyses why some NHS trusts have departed from national arrangements and adopted a local pay regime, while others have not. It finds that the primary determinant is the attitude of management, particularly the chief executive. This is value driven and not a pragmatic response to the labour market. Although a healthy financial position is a necessary condition for a trust pay regime, it is not an adequate causative explanation. Moreover, while management sets the agenda, the pace, manner and extent of change, are tempered by the cohesiveness and vigour of the staff‐side and the power of the medical profession. It also suggests that in some trusts more immediately pressing priorities have taken precedence over the government initiative on local pay bargaining, so it will be some time before fully fledged pay systems are adopted.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Opting Out of Pay Devolution? The Prospects for Local Pay Bargaining in UK Public ServicesBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1994
- How Big A Step Is ‘Next Steps’? Industrial Relations Developments In Civil Service Executive AgenciesHuman Resource Management Journal, 1993
- Industrial Relations Developments in NHS TrustsEmployee Relations, 1992
- Just ManagingPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Industrial Relations in the NHSPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Contemporary British Industrial RelationsPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Prospects for industrial relations in NHS trustsIndustrial Relations Journal, 1991
- BARGAINING WITHIN THE ENTERPRISE: CENTRALIZED OR DECENTRALIZED?Journal of Management Studies, 1987