Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy
- 23 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 19 (5) , 650-655
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-9068-6
Abstract
The role of laparoscopic colon resection in the management of colon cancer is still controversial. In this article, the surgical strategy and techniques are described, with further consideration of the oncologically relevant aspects.Between March 1993 and July 2003, we performed laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in 56 patients with right colon carcinoma. Average age was 74.5 years (range, 17-92). We performed a standardized surgical procedure that included mobilization from the vascularized mesenteric bridges with a window technique, transection of the ileocolic lymphovascular pedicle, and lateral and proximal mobilization of the ileocecum, ascending colon, right flexure, and proximale transversum. After enlargement of one of the trocar incisions the exteriorized colon was resected and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the standard manner.There were no conversions to open. The mean operating time was 119 +/- 38 min, the mean length of resected colon was 27.8 +/- 4.48 cm, and the average width of the clear margins was 6.8 +/- 5.3 cm. One patient died. Lymph nodes were positive in 21 patients. The 5-year survival rate in the 48 patients who were operated on with curative intent was 75%. We have had two local recurrences. The overall 5-year mortality-free fraction was 63%. Cox multivariate analysis showed that the mortality-prognostic factors were tumor stage and length of resected colon, whereas Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mortality-prognostic factors were positive lymph nodes and tumor stage.Our results show that laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer can be performed safely. Complications and recurrence rates are comparable to those for left-sided laparoscopic and open procedures. Therefore, we recommend this procedure as the method of choice. Laparoscopically treated patients with stage II and stage III disease have almost the same cumulative rate of survival.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Results of laparoscopic vs open resections for colon cancer in patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 yearsSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2002
- Results of laparoscopically assisted colon resection for carcinomaSurgical Endoscopy, 2001
- Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2000
- Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancySurgery, 1999
- Laparotomy and laparoscopy differentially accelerate experimental flank tumour growthBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Early results of a prospective multicenter study on 500 consecutive cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 1998
- Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resectionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
- The increase in immunosuppression and its role in the development of malignant lesionsJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1985
- Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgeryDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1983