Paiela “women‐men”: the reflexive foundations of gender ideology
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Ethnologist
- Vol. 11 (1) , 118-138
- https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1984.11.1.02a00070
Abstract
Paiela notions about femaleness and maleness stem from an indigenous reflexive doctrine concerning the character of “women‐men” or humanity. This reflexive doctrine, that “we” are both “good” and “bad,” serves as the semantic key to a rather unique social structure predicated on a distinction between domestic and public domains and its moral entailments. The way in which gender functions as a master code of that structure is explored at length. In a concluding section, possible global applications of the analysis are proposed and, more cautiously, an explanation of the sources of women's inferiority in a certain class of societies is offered without recourse to reductionist argumentation. [gender, women's status, Melanesia, social structure, reflexivity]Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Achievement of Sex:Published by JSTOR ,2017
- Ginger Gardens for the Ginger Woman: Rites and Passages in a Melanesian SocietyMan, 1982
- Culture in a Netbag: The Manufacture of a Subdiscipline in AnthropologyMan, 1981
- The Use and Abuse of Anthropology: Reflections on Feminism and Cross-Cultural UnderstandingSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 1980
- Women's Status in Egalitarian Society: Implications for Social Evolution [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 1978
- women and men in the Enga teeAmerican Ethnologist, 1978
- Trobriand Descent:Ethos, 1977
- “PIGS ARE OUR HEARTS!”: The Te Exchange Cycleamongthe Mae Engaof New Guinea1Oceania, 1974
- 2. African Models in the New Guinea HighlandsMan, 1962
- THE IPILI OF THE PORGERA VALLEY, WESTERN HIGHLANDS DISTRICT, TERRITORY OF NEW GUINEAOceania, 1957