The Validity and Utility of Subjective Quality of Life: a Reply to Hatton & Ager
- 1 September 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
- Vol. 15 (3) , 261-268
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2002.00123.x
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of Life Measurement and People with Intellectual Disabilities: a Reply to CumminsJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2002
- Is Satisfaction a Valid Concept in the Assessment of Quality of Life of People with Intellectual Disabilities? A Review of the LiteratureJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2001
- Sources of meaning in life for young and old Israeli Jews and ArabsJournal of Aging Studies, 2001
- Inclusion and the transition: Transfer from special to mainstream–ten years laterBritish Journal of Special Education, 2001
- The subjective well-being of people caring for a family member with a severe disability at home: a reviewJournal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 2001
- Is disability pension related to quality of life?Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 1998
- An Initial Evaluation of the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale‐‐Intellectual DisabilityInternational Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 1997
- The discriminate validity of the Lifestyle Satisfaction Scale (LSS) for the assessment of Australian adults with intellectual disabilitiesJournal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 1996
- The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaosSocial Indicators Research, 1996
- On the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-beingSocial Indicators Research, 1995