Cervical cytology reported as negative and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix: no strong evidence of benefit
- 1 April 1995
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in British Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 71 (4) , 894-897
- https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1995.172
Abstract
The relationship between negative cervical cytology reports and risk of adenocarcinoma of the cervix was evaluated in a case-control study of 113 cases and 452 controls. All cases and controls had received at least two negative cytology reports. There was no significant difference between the cases and controls in the number of negative cytology reports or in history of cervical abnormality; while a test for trend in the time since last negative cytology report was significant (P < 0.001), the estimated benefit was very modest. Although the estimates of relative protection were higher in women aged less than 35 years than in women aged 35-69 years, this difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that cervical screening as practised in the 1970s and 1980s was much less effective in preventing adenocarcinoma than squamous carcinoma of the cervix.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using administrative data for case-control studies: The case of the papanicolaou smearAnnals of Epidemiology, 1993
- Duration of relative protection of screening for cervical cancerPreventive Medicine, 1989
- Variation in the duration of protection given by screening using the pap test for cervical cancerJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- A Case-Control Study of Cervical Cytology before Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer in DenmarkInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1988
- The effectiveness of cervical screening: A population-based case-control studyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- A comparison of physician and patient reports of pap smear historiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1987
- Cervical adenocarcinoma and oral contraceptives.BMJ, 1987
- A case-control study of cervical cancer screening in north east Scotland.BMJ, 1985
- "PAP" SMEAR AND THE RISK OF CERVICAL NEOPLASIA: QUANTITATIVE ESTIMATES FROM A CASE-CONTROL STUDYThe Lancet, 1984
- ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE UTERINE CERVIX A CLINICAL AND PATHOLOGICAL APPRAISALBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1976