Can Labeling Theory Be Saved?*,1
- 1 March 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Symbolic Interaction
- Vol. 1 (2) , 74-89
- https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1978.1.2.74
Abstract
Despite numerous criticisms during the last decade, labeling theory has maintained pre‐eminence among theories of deviance. The critiques of the positivists, neo‐Marxists, and phenomenologists are reviewed along with their respective prescriptions for the development of a more satisfactory theory of deviance. While the changes advocated by the first two groups are rejected on logical and empirical grounds, some of the suggestions of the phenomenologists are viewed as necessary corrections to labeling theory. Recommendations are made that call for 1) consideration of ‘categorical’, ‘contextual’, and ‘potential’ labeling, 2) application and development of the labeling perspective in substantive areas other than deviance, and 3) construction of explicit and defensible ethical positions for persons involved in labeling studies.This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Humanitarian Reform and Biracial Sexual Assault in a Maximum Security PrisonUrban Life, 1977
- Secrecy in the Lesbian WorldUrban Life, 1976
- Art as Collective ActionAmerican Sociological Review, 1976
- The Poverty of the Sociology of Deviance: Nuts, Sluts, and PrevertsSocial Problems, 1972
- Societal Reaction and Career Deviance: A Critical AnalysisThe Sociological Quarterly, 1971
- Problems in the Sociology of Deviance: Social Definitions and BehaviorSocial Forces, 1968
- The Meanings of Occupational Prestige: Reconsideration of the Norc ScaleAmerican Sociological Review, 1963
- Paranoia and the Dynamics of ExclusionSociometry, 1962
- Conditions of Successful Degradation CeremoniesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1956