Machiavellian Privatization
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 92 (1) , 240-258
- https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015694
Abstract
We analyze politically motivated privatization in a bipartisan environment. When median-class voters a priori favor redistributive policies, a strategic privatization program allocating them enough shares can induce a voting shift away from left-wing parties whose policy would reduce the value of shareholdings. To induce median-class voters to buy enough shares to shift political preferences, strategic rationing and underpricing is often necessary. In the extreme, this may lead to free share distribution and voucher privatization. Shifting voting preferences becomes impossible when strong ex ante political constraints require large upfront transfers to insiders or when social inequality is extreme. (JEL D72, L33, P16, P35)Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Share issue privatizations as financial means to political and economic endsJournal of Financial Economics, 1999
- Public Offerings of State‐Owned And Privately‐Owned Enterprises: An International ComparisonThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- How cynical can an incumbent be? Strategic policy in a model of government spendingJournal of Public Economics, 1994
- The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical AnalysisThe Journal of Finance, 1994
- Voucher privatizationJournal of Financial Economics, 1994
- A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government DebtThe Review of Economic Studies, 1990
- Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned EnterprisesThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1989
- The privatisation process in France and the U.K.European Economic Review, 1988
- Macroeconomic Policy in a Two-Party System as a Repeated GameThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1987
- A Rational Theory of the Size of GovernmentJournal of Political Economy, 1981