Comparison of the Costs and Morbidity of Percutaneous and Open Flank Procedures
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 135 (6) , 1150-1152
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)46020-4
Abstract
A series of 47 percutaneous procedures for renal calculi was matched by description of calculi and previous flank exploration to 47 open flank procedures for comparison of relative morbidity and cost-efficiency. A retrospective analysis of paired data demonstrated that patients undergoing percutaneous procedures experienced significantly decreased duration of anesthesia, number of transfusions, postoperative disability, and duration and cost of hospitalization. These findings support the cost-effectiveness of the percutaneous approach to removal of renal calculi.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Extraction of Renal and Ureteral Calculi from 100 PatientsJournal of Urology, 1984
- Percutaneous Dissolution of Renal Calculi Using Ultrasonic LitholapaxySouthern Medical Journal, 1984
- Percutaneous LithotripsyJournal of Urology, 1983
- Elective Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in 50 Patients:an Analysis of the Technique, Results and ComplicationsJournal of Urology, 1983
- Percutaneous Stone ManipulationJournal of Urology, 1981
- Ultrasound Litholapaxy of a Staghorn CalculusJournal of Urology, 1977
- Ultraschall-Lithotripsie von Ureter- und Nierensteinen: experimentelle und erste klinische UntersuchungenPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- Percutaneous PyelolithotomyScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1976
- EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974
- An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)Biometrika, 1965