Gender Differences in HIV-1 RNA Rebound Attributed to Incomplete Antiretroviral Adherence Among HIV-Infected Patients in a Population-Based Cohort
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
- Vol. 37 (4) , 1470-1476
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qai.0000138379.39317.62
Abstract
There have been growing concerns about possible gender-related differences in rates of responses to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We therefore examined the association between gender and time to HIV-1 RNA rebound in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients initiating HAART in a population-based setting. We evaluated all antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected men and women who achieved HIV-1 RNA suppression at least once (HIV RNA <500 copies/mL) after initiating HAART between August 1, 1996 and July 31, 2000 and who were followed until March 31, 2002 in a province-wide HIV treatment program. We evaluated time to HIV-1 RNA rebound (≥500 copies/mL) using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression. In total, 844 (87.0%) men and 126 (13.0%) women initiated HAART during the study period and achieved HIV-1 RNA suppression at least once. Overall rates of rebound were 47.4% and 34.0% for women and men, respectively (log-rank, P < 0.021). Women were less likely to be ≥95% adherent (P = 0.001) and more likely to have a history of injection drug use (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, incomplete adherence was found to be highly predictive of HIV-1 RNA rebound (adjusted relative hazard [ARH] = 4.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.33-5.00). Although female patients had higher rates of HIV-1 RNA rebound in univariate analysis (relative hazard [RH] = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.05-1.82), this was no longer statistically significant once other known confounders such as adherence and injection drug use were adjusted for (RH = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.71-1.28). When the analyses were stratified based on history of injection drug use, we found that rates of rebound were higher among injection drug-using women than among injection drug-using men (P = 0.048), whereas there was no gender difference among non-injection drug users with respect to rebound (P = 0.345). We found that higher rates of HIV-1 RNA rebound among women were primarily explained by incomplete adherence, which was more prevalent among women in this cohort. Our findings suggest that psychosocial factors such as drug use and incomplete adherence predict HIV-1 RNA rebound and that gender differences in time to rebound can be largely attributed to a disproportionate prevalence of these factors among women in this population.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Access to Antiretroviral Treatment, Incidence of Sustained Therapy Interruptions, and Risk of Clinical Events According to SexJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2003
- Is there a baseline CD4 cell count that precludes a survival response to modern antiretroviral therapy?AIDS, 2003
- A prospective study of predictors of adherence to combination antiretroviral medicationJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2002
- Raised viral load in patients with viral suppression on highly active antiretroviral therapy: transient increase or treatment failure?AIDS, 2002
- Problem drinking and medication adherence among persons with HIV infectionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Adherence to Triple Therapy and Viral Load ResponseJAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 2000
- Adherence to HAART in French HIV-infected injecting drug users: the contribution of buprenorphine drug maintenance treatmentAIDS, 2000
- Sex Differences in Longitudinal Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Levels among SeroconvertersThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
- The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: Methods, validity, and applicationsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1997
- Physicians' Experience with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome as a Factor in Patients' SurvivalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996