Comparing vaginal and coelioscopic total or subtotal hysterectomies: prospective multicentre study including 82 patients
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Gynaecological Endoscopy
- Vol. 10 (5-6) , 315-321
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00472.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Hysterectomy: indications, surgical routes, cases for adnexal or cervical conservationEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1998
- A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time?The Lancet, 1995
- A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo‐oophorectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1994
- Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo‐ophorectomyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1993
- Laparoscopic Supracervical (Subtotal) Hysterectomy (LASH)Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, 1993
- The mortality risk associated with hysterectomyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United StatesAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982