Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data
Open Access
- 12 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 25 (4) , 215-220
- https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn023
Abstract
Background. The medical records of patients with cancer need to accurately record diagnoses for professionals to provide quality care. Aims. (i) To develop a methodology which identifies medical records of patients with a cancer diagnosis. (ii) To describe the effectiveness of search strategies to identify all patients in primary care with a cancer diagnosis compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry. Methods. The design of the study was a retrospective analysis of primary care medical records. Five general practices were recruited in the UK. The completeness and correctness of searches were measured and compared both within the practices and compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry. Results. One in five of all primary care patients with cancer was not identified when a search for all patients with cancer was conducted using electronic codes for malignancy. One in five patient records with an electronic code for a malignancy that was confirmed by registration with the Cancer Registry actually lacked the necessary documentation to verify the cancer type, date of diagnosis or any other aspect of the malignant condition. Overall, electronic codes for cancer in these medical records have a poor level of completeness (29.4%) and correctness (65.6%) when compared with the Cancer Registry. Conclusions. The electronic codes in five general practices were not able to identify all patients on the practice lists with a cancer diagnosis. Practices will only be able to comply with guidelines and meet quality targets if they can identify all of their current patients with a cancer diagnosis and will require information from a Cancer Registry in order to do this.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cross sectional study of performance indicators for English Primary Care Trusts: testing construct validity and identifying explanatory variablesBMC Health Services Research, 2006
- Do the incentive payments in the new NHS contract for primary care reflect likely population health gains?Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2006
- General practictioners' management of cancer in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients - CancerEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 2005
- Psychosocial care for cancer patients in primary care? Recognition of opportunities for cancer careFamily Practice, 2004
- The electronic patient record in primary care--regression or progression? A cross sectional studyBMJ, 2003
- Primary care oncology: essential if high quality cancer care is to be achieved for all.Family Practice, 2002
- How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (darts) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes registerBMJ, 1997
- Computerised data collection: practicability and quality in selected general practicesFamily Practice, 1995
- Global public health and the information superhighwayBMJ, 1994