The refined crystal structure of Pseudomonas putida lipoamide dehydrogenase complexed with NAD+ at 2.45 Å resolution
- 1 August 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 13 (4) , 336-351
- https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340130406
Abstract
The three‐dimensional structure of one of the three lipoamide dehydroge‐nases occurring in Pseudomonas putida, LipDH Val, has been determined at 2.45 Å resolution. The orthorhombic crystals, grown in the presence of 20 mM NAD+, contain 458 residues per asymmetric unit. A crystallographic 2‐fold axis generates the dimer which is observed in solution. The final crystallographic R‐factor is 21.8% for 18,216 unique reflections and a model consisting of 3,452 protein atoms, 189 solvent molecules and 44 NAD+ atoms, while the overall B‐factor is unusually high; 47 Å2. The structure of LipDH Val reveals the conformation of the C‐terminal residues which fold “back” into the putative lipoamide binding region. The C‐terminus has been proven to be important for activity by site‐directed mutagene‐sis. However, the distance of the C‐terminus to the catalytically essential residues is surprisingly large, over 6 Å, and the precise role of the C‐terminus still needs to be elucidated. In this crystal form LipDH Val contains one NAD+ molecule per subunit. Its adenine‐ribose moiety occupies an analogous position as in the structure of glutathione reductase. However, the nicotinamide‐ribose moiety is far removed from its expected position near the isoallox‐azine ring and points into solution. Comparison of LipDH Val with Azotobacter vinelandii lipoamide dehydrogenase yields an rms difference of 1.6 Å for 440 well defined Cα atoms per subunit. Comparing LipDH Val with glutathione reductase shows large differences in the tertiary and quaternary structure of the two enzymes. For instance, the two subunits in the dimer are shifted by 6 Å with respect to each other. So, LipDH Val confirms the surprising differences in molecular architecture between glutathione reductase and lipoamide dehydrogenase, which were already observed in Azotobacter vinelandii LipDH. This is the more remarkable since the active sites are located at the subunit interface and are virtually identical in all three enzymes.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Refined crystal structure of lipoamide dehydrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii at 2.2 Å resolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1991
- Convergent evolution of similar function in two structurally divergent enzymesNature, 1991
- Molecular dynamics refinement of a thermitase-eglin-c complex at 1.98 Å resolution and comparison of two crystal forms that differ in calcium contentJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- Substrate binding and catalysis by glutathione reductase as derived from refined enzyme: Substrate crystal structures at 2Å resolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- X-ray structure of lipoamide dehydrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii determined by a combination of molecular and isomorphous replacement techniquesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1989
- Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical featuresBiopolymers, 1983
- Comparison of the three-dimensional protein and nucleotide structure of the FAD-binding domain of p-hydroxybenzoate hydroxylase with the FAD- as well as NADPH-binding domains of glutathione reductaseJournal of Molecular Biology, 1983
- Three-dimensional structure of glutathione reductase at 2 Å resolutionJournal of Molecular Biology, 1981
- Chemical and biological evolution of a nucleotide-binding proteinNature, 1974
- The detection of sub-units within the crystallographic asymmetric unitActa Crystallographica, 1962