A comparison of tissue weight distribution in Landrace, Hampshire and Duroc Jersey pigs
- 1 October 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 93 (2) , 271-280
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600037953
Abstract
SUMMARY: The carcasses of 20 Landrace, 20 Hampshire and 20 Duroc Jersey barrows were dissected in order to study the influence of the breed on tissue weight distribution.After weaning, at 56 days of age, the animals were allocated to individual pens and fed a standard diet containing 18% crude protein and 13 MJ ME/kg, until they reached their designated slaughter weight.The Landrace and Hampshire pigs were slaughtered between 60 and 115 kg and the Duroc Jersey ones between 40 and 115 kg live weight. The right half carcasses were completely dissected using strictly anatomical criteria. Individual muscles were classified into eight anatomical groups (Carden & Goenaga, 1977).The results were examined by covariance analyses utilizing the allometric equation. Carcass tissue composition was studied using the weight of the dissected side as covariate. When muscle: bone ratio was examined, the weight of total side muscle was used as the independent variable. The growth of different parts of a tissue relative to the corresponding whole tissue was studied.Concerning carcass composition, there were significant breed differences in muscle and fat contents and in the muscle:bone ratio.Breed differences were found in muscle distribution. The 6 values of muscle groups 1 (proximal hind limb), 2 (distal hind limb), 6 (distal forelimb) and 7 (muscles connecting forelimb to thorax) were statistically different as were the adjusted means of groups 3 (spinal column), 5 (proximal forelimb) and 8 (muscles connecting forelimb to neck and intrinsic muscles of neck and thorax).Significant differences were also found in bone weight distribution. Slope values of the tarsals, os coxae, scapula and sternum were statistically different. Adjusted means of tibia-fibula, sacrum, spinal column, radius-ulna, carpals and ribs were also significantly different.Finally, there were breed effects in the distribution of fat, the relative weight of subcutaneous and of intermuscular fat being statistically different.This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Growth changes in the distribution of dissectable and intramuscular fat in pigsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1977
- Objectives in pig breedingAnimal Science, 1976
- Variation in lean distribution among steer carcasses of different breeds and crossesThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1976
- A comparison of body composition and tissue distribution of Friesian and Angus steersThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1976
- Muscle weight distribution in four breeds of cattle with reference to individual muscles, anatomical groups and wholesale cutsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1976
- DÉTERMINISME GÉNÉTIQUE DU SYNDROME D'HYPERTHERMIE MALIGNE CHEZ LE PORC DE PIÉTRAINAnnales de Génétique et de Sélection Animale, 1975
- A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight 2. Growth changes in muscle distributionAnimal Science, 1974
- A comparison of tissue development in Pietrain and Large White pigs from birth to 64 kg live weight 1. Growth changes in carcass compositionAnimal Science, 1974
- Influence of breed and sex on muscle weight distribution of cattleThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1973
- The effect of body-weight loss on the composition of Brahman cross and Africander cross steers: II. Dissected components of the dressed carcassThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1973