Tasks, Ensembles, and Activity
- 1 October 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Written Communication
- Vol. 20 (4) , 511-559
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303260691
Abstract
This article is concerned with characterizing literacy activity as it is practiced in professional workplaces. Its starting point is activity theory, which grew out of the work of Vygotsky and has been subsequently elaborated in Russia and elsewhere. First, the authors propose that existing versions of activity theory are unable to account adequately for practical human activity in contemporary workplaces, and present a revised perspective that opens the way for new theoretical developments. Second, they elaborate two new constructs, task and work ensemble, and apply them to a short collaborative writing sequence collected in the field. Both constructs are seen to account in a substantive way for the structure of the composing activity carried out by the collaborators. They close with a discussion of the complementarity and theoretical advantages of the two constructs.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Writing as an Embodied PracticeJournal of Business and Technical Communication, 2001
- Objects of Study in Situated LiteracyWritten Communication, 1999
- Writing assessment: Raters' elaboration of the rating taskAssessing Writing, 1998
- The Uses and Complexity of Argument Structures in Expert and Student Persuasive WritingWritten Communication, 1998
- Unit of Analysis in Transit: From the Individual's Knowledge to the Ensemble ProcessMind, Culture, and Activity, 1998
- Consciousness as a Problem for the Psychology of BehaviorPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- The Historical Meaning of the Crisis in Psychology: A Methodological InvestigationPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- Can preschool children invent addition algorithms?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1977
- Representing logical and semantic structure of knowledge acquired from discourseCognitive Psychology, 1975
- A chronometric analysis of simple addition.Psychological Review, 1972