Evaluation of a clinical test. I: Assessment of reliability
- 30 June 2001
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 108 (6) , 562-567
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-5456(00)00150-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How useful is uterine artery Doppler flow velocimetry in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation and perinatal death? An overviewBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Misleading authors’ inferences in obstetric diagnostic test literatureAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- Is Real-Time Ultrasonic Bladder Volume Estimation Reliable and Valid? A Systematic OverviewScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1998
- Evaluating measurement variability in clinical investigations: the case of ultrasonic estimation of urinary bladder volumeBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- The diagnostic accuracy of cervico‐vaginal fetal fibronectin in predicting preterm delivery: an overvievBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997
- Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures.BMJ, 1992
- Measuring measuring errorsStatistics in Medicine, 1989
- A rEAPPRAISAL OF THE KAPPA COEFFICIENTJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordanceClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1981
- The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and JudgmentsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1975