Entecavir versus Lamivudine for Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 9 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 354 (10) , 1011-1020
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa051287
Abstract
Entecavir is a potent and selective antiviral agent that has demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 studies in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)–negative chronic hepatitis B. In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 648 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue to receive 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis). Histologic improvement after 48 weeks of treatment occurred in 208 of 296 patients in the entecavir group who had adequate baseline liver-biopsy specimens that could be evaluated (70 percent), as compared with 174 of 287 such patients in the lamivudine group (61 percent, P=0.01). More patients in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine group had undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels according to a polymerase-chain-reaction assay (90 percent vs. 72 percent, P<0.001) and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (78 percent vs. 71 percent, P=0.045). The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline to week 48 was greater with entecavir than with lamivudine (5.0 vs. 4.5 log [on a base-10 scale] copies per milliliter, P<0.001). There was no evidence of resistance to entecavir. Safety and adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups. Among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue, the rates of histologic improvement, virologic response, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly higher at 48 weeks with entecavir than with lamivudine. The safety profile of the two agents was similar, and there was no evidence of viral resistance to entecavir. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00035789.)Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Extended lamivudine treatment in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis BJournal of Hepatology, 2005
- Peginterferon Alfa-2a Alone, Lamivudine Alone, and the Two in Combination in Patients with HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis BNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Clinical Emergence of Entecavir-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Requires Additional Substitutions in Virus Already Resistant to LamivudineAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2004
- Current management of chronic hepatitis BAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2003
- Treatment of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis BSeminars in Liver Disease, 2003
- Quantitative serum HBV DNA levels during different stages of chronic hepatitis B infectionHepatology, 2002
- Relationship between the Development of Precore and Core Promoter Mutations and Hepatitis B e Antigen Seroconversion in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B VirusThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis BHepatology, 2001
- Consensus statements on the prevention and management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in the Asia–Pacific region 1Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2000
- Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis†Hepatology, 1981