Circadian Differences in the Dichotic Processing of Voicing
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 68 (1-2) , 43-52
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00207459308994258
Abstract
Male and female adult subjects (N = 112) were tested at two times (morning and afternoon) for time-of-day related shifts in linguistic processing on dichotic listening tasks using (1) a divided-attention paradigm for processing digits (0-9) and (2) a focused-attention paradigm for processing consonant-vowel (CV) combinations which were grouped according to the voiced and unvoiced stop consonants. Time-of-day effects were not evident on digits using the divided-attention paradigm. However, on CVs a predicted two-way interaction for Time-of-Day Voicing—due to superior detection of voiced stimuli in the afternoon—was evident. This effect is consistent with a circadian-linked increase in right hemisphere involvement later in the day. Implications for theory, research and educational applications are discussedKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Directed attention dichotic listening in reading disabled children: A test of four models of maladaptive lateralizationNeuropsychologia, 1990
- A signal detection procedure eliminates priming biases in dichotic listeningNeuropsychologia, 1987
- Multi-oscillatory control of circadian rhythms in human performanceNature, 1983
- The lengthy persistence of priming effects in dichotic listeningNeuropsychologia, 1982
- Time of day and level of processingMemory & Cognition, 1979
- Dichotic speech perception: An interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effectsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973
- Memory and Time of DayQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970
- Time of day effects on performance in a range of tasksPsychonomic Science, 1967
- Functional Asymmetry of the Brain in Dichotic ListeningCortex, 1967
- Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli.Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1961