Surveillance of Pregnancy Loss in Human Populations
- 1 January 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
- Vol. 4 (1-2) , 285-291
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.1983.4.1-2.285
Abstract
Surveillance of pregnancy loss as a way to detect hazardous exposures is attractive in principle. However, there are no established methods for monitoring pregnancy loss in humans. Surveillance is difficult because most loss occurs within the first 12 weeks of gestation, when pregnancy may not he documented or even recognized. Three possible approaches to surveillance of pregnancy loss are discussed here: direct surveillance of recognized loss, direct surveillance of unrecognized loss, and indirect surveillance of all loss. These approaches vary in cost, technique, power, and interpretability. While these surveillance methods appear potentially useful, their effectiveness in practice has not yet been determined.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Method for Monitoring the Fertility of WorkersJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1980
- FETAL LOSS AFTER IMPLANTATIONThe Lancet, 1980
- The immunological approach to pregnancy diagnosis: a reviewVeterinary Record, 1980
- Retrospective Evaluation of Reproductive Performance of Workers Exposed to Ethylene Dibromide (EDB)Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1979
- AN EARLY PREGNANCY FACTOR DETECTED IN HUMAN SERUM BY THE ROSETTE INHIBITION TESTThe Lancet, 1977
- WHERE HAVE ALL THE CONCEPTIONS GONE?The Lancet, 1975
- EARLY DETECTION OF IMPLANTATION USING A RADIOIMMUNOASSAY SPECIFIC FOR HUMAN CHORIONIC GONADOTROPINJournal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 1973
- Pregnancy testing as a fertility measurement technique: a preliminary report on field results.American Journal of Public Health, 1971
- The incidence of spontaneous abortionPopulation Studies, 1970