Children's Models of Understanding of Two Major Global Environmental Issues (Ozone Layer and Greenhouse Effect)
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research in Science & Technological Education
- Vol. 15 (1) , 19-28
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150102
Abstract
This work sets out to quantify the dominant models that 13 and 14 year‐old children hold of the causes of the greenhouse effect and ozone layer depletion. In particular, it attempts to assess the prevalence of those ideas which, in the minds of some, link the two phenomena. It would seem that about twice as many children (around 80%) think that holes in the ozone layer cause the greenhouse effect than think the greenhouse effect causes ozone layer damage. The most common suggested connection (around 60% of children) appears to be that the holes in the ozone layer somehow allow more solar energy to arrive at the earth, no distinction being made between heat rays and ultra‐violet rays. Other, more bizarre, models, which assume global warming is a consequence of ozone depletion, seem to find at most 20% approval. Of those ideas which constitute a causal link in the opposite direction, the most common view appears to be that the greenhouse effect causes more smoke and pollution to rise, or causes it to rise to greater heights, and this damages the ozone layer. Other models are also identified and discussed.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The ideas of secondary school children concerning ozone layer damageGlobal Environmental Change, 1994
- Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the ClassroomEducational Researcher, 1994
- The ‘Greenhouse Effect’: children's perceptions of causes, consequences and curesInternational Journal of Science Education, 1993
- Greenhouse physicsPhysics World, 1990
- Analysis and Synthesis of Research on Responsible Environmental Behavior: A Meta-AnalysisThe Journal of Environmental Education, 1987
- The pupils’ view of electricity revisited: social development or cognitive growth?International Journal of Science Education, 1987