Phase iii randomized trial of interleukin-2 with or without lymphokine-activated killer cells in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma
- 1 September 1995
- Vol. 76 (5) , 824-832
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19950901)76:5<824::aid-cncr2820760517>3.0.co;2-n
Abstract
Background. Treatment with interleukin-2 (IL-2) and lymphokine-activated killer cells (LAK) resulted in responses in some patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the relative therapeutic benefit of the addition of LAK to IL-2 was unknown. Methods. A randomized Phase III trial was conducted in patients with RCC comparing continuous intravenous infusion (CI) IL-2 alone with CI IL-2 plus LAK. Interleukin-2 was administered at 3 × 106 U/m2/day on days 1–5, 13–17, 21–24, and 28–31. Patients on the LAK treatment arm underwent leukapheresis on days 8–10 and LAK cell reinfusion on days 13–15. The results are reported with long-term follow-up. The published experience with IL-2 alone or with the addition of LAK was investigated in a quantitative literature survey. The response proportions were studied by schedule (high dose bolus, moderate dose, low dose) and by concomitant administration of LAK. Results. Seventy-one patients were treated, 36 on the IL-2 arm and 35 on the IL-2 plus LAK arm. Four patients (6%) had major responses (two complete, two partial). The median survival of all patients was 13 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9–18 months). There were no differences between treatment arms with regard to response (P=0.61) and survival (P=0.67). More patients on the LAK arm experienced pulmonary toxicity (P=0.008). The overall weighted response proportion was 16% (95% CI, 8%-24%) for the 39 published series of 1291 patients treated with IL-2. The 95% confidence intervals for response proportion overlapped when compared by schedule and by administration of LAK. Conclusions. The dose and schedule of IL-2 used in this study resulted in a low level of antitumor activity and the addition of LAK did not improve the response rate against RCC. Given the infrequent, but reproducible, responses with IL-2 and interferon-based regimens, continued investigation of these agents is warranted as is the study of new cytokines. Alternative treatment strategies should be studied in RCC and new agents and treatment regimens that appear promising in Phase II studies must be studied in randomized tria.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized comparison of high-dose and low-dose intravenous interleukin-2 for the therapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an interim report.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- Prospective Randomized Trial of High-Dose Interleukin-2 Alone or in Conjunction With Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cells for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- A randomized phase II trial of continuous infusion interleukin-2 or bolus injection interleukin-2 plus lymphokine-activated killer cells for advanced renal cell carcinoma.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1992
- Randomized Study of Interleukin 2 (IL-2) Alone vs IL-2 Plus Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cells for Treatment of Melanoma and Renal Cell CancerArchives of Surgery, 1991
- High-Dose Recombinant Interleukin-2 Alone: A Regimen With Limited Activity in the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell CarcinomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1990
- Metastatic Renal Cancer Treated with Interleukin-2 and Lymphokine-Activated Killer CellsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988
- A Progress Report on the Treatment of 157 Patients with Advanced Cancer Using Lymphokine-Activated Killer Cells and Interleukin-2 or High-Dose Interleukin-2 AloneNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Constant-Infusion Recombinant Interleukin-2 in Adoptive Immunotherapy of Advanced CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Reporting results of cancer treatmentCancer, 1981
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958