Interim Analyses in Clinical Research
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cancer Investigation
- Vol. 5 (5) , 469-477
- https://doi.org/10.3109/07357908709032904
Abstract
Interim analyses are those that occur before the scheduled completion of a clinical study. The motivation for such analyses may be to see whether conclusive evidence is available concerning the aims of the study, or it may be simple curiosity. Statisticians disagree about the impact that interim analyses have on inferences that can be drawn from the study. The significance testing view insists that conclusions from a study with interim analyses are different than from one without—even though the data are identical. In the Bayesian view there is no penalty for interim analyses: study results can even be monitored continually without changing the conclusions. Both views are explained and recommendations for designing and analyzing studies with interim analyses are made.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can early stopping procedures impact significantly on the efficiency of clinical trials without serious loss of information?Statistics in Medicine, 1984
- Comment on “statistical inference from clinical trials: Choosing the right P value”Controlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- Comments on the Dupont manuscriptControlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- Discrete Sequential Boundaries for Clinical TrialsBiometrika, 1983
- Clinical Trials and Statistical Verdicts: Probable Grounds for AppealAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- Sequential stopping rules and sequentially adjusted P values: Does one require the other?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- Some statistical methods useful in circulation research.Circulation Research, 1980
- Biostatistics: how to detect, correct and prevent errors in the medical literature.Circulation, 1980
- Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trialsBiometrika, 1977
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976