Methods to Account for Attrition in Longitudinal Data: Do They Work? A Simulation Study
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 20 (8) , 657-662
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-005-7919-7
Abstract
Attrition threatens the internal validity of cohort studies. Epidemiologists use various imputation and weighting methods to limit bias due to attrition. However, the ability of these methods to correct for attrition bias has not been tested. We simulated a cohort of 300 subjects using 500 computer replications to determine whether regression imputation, individual weighting, or multiple imputation is useful to reduce attrition bias. We compared these results to a complete subject analysis. Our logistic regression model included a binary exposure and two confounders. We generated 10, 25, and 40% attrition through three missing data mechanisms: missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR), and used four covariance matrices to vary attrition. We compared true and estimated mean odds ratios (ORs), standard deviations (SDs), and coverage. With data MCAR and MAR for all attrition rates, the complete subject analysis produced results at least as valid as those from the imputation and weighting methods. With data MNAR, no method provided unbiased estimates of the OR at attrition rates of 25 or 40%. When observations are not MAR or MCAR, imputation and weighting methods may not effectively reduce attrition bias.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- An application of a weighting method to adjust for nonresponse in standardized incidence ratio analysis of cohort studiesAnnals of Epidemiology, 2005
- Multiple imputation for body mass index: lessons from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's HealthStatistics in Medicine, 2004
- Imputations of Missing Values in Practice: Results from Imputations of Serum Cholesterol in 28 Cohort StudiesAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- An epidemiological study of the magnitude and consequences of work related violence: the Minnesota Nurses’ StudyOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2004
- A method for imputing missing data in longitudinal studies*1Annals of Epidemiology, 2004
- Imputation of missing longitudinal data: a comparison of methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2003
- Attrition in longitudinal studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2002
- Multiple Imputation after 18+ YearsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1996
- Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures StudiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- A comparison of analytic methods for non-random missingness of outcome dataJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995