The effect of gender, deceit orientation and communicator style on macro‐assessments of honesty
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Quarterly
- Vol. 36 (2) , 77-93
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378809369711
Abstract
Recently, deception research has focused primarily on micro‐analytic methods of lie detection (e.g., eye contact duration, response latency, vocal errors). This study adopted a macro‐assessment approach, where deception detection is based on global evaluations of communication, specifically honesty evaluation based on communicator style. 385 subjects viewed four different videotape segments of individuals participating in a simulated job interview. Two of the individuals were truthful throughout the interview, and two fabricated false information on some questions. Subjects were asked to evaluate or assess the honesty level of these individuals, as well as assess a number of communicator style dimensions. Multiple regression analyses revealed that honesty assessments can be predicted from communication style characterized by high friendliness, attentiveness, and preciseness, and low animated and dramatic styles. Some differences were observed for communicator style predictions of honesty based on liars/truthers, subject gender, target gender, and deceit‐orientation differences. Implications for future research are noted.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Telling ingratiating lies: Effects of target sex and target attractiveness on verbal and nonverbal deceptive success.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1985
- Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983
- Nonverbal communication and deception: Differences in deception cues due to gender and communicator dominanceCommunication Monographs, 1983
- Understanding and assessing nonverbal expressiveness: The Affective Communication Test.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
- Nonverbal Cues as Indicators of Verbal DissemblingAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1978
- BODY MOVEMENT AND VOICE PITCH IN DECEPTIVE INTERACTIONSemiotica, 1976
- Detecting deception from the body or face.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1974
- IMPLICATIONS AND SPECULATIONSPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- VISUAL INTERACTION IN RELATION TO MACHIAVELLIANISM AND AN UNETHICAL ACTPublished by Elsevier ,1970
- Nonverbal Leakage and Clues to Deception†Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, 1969