Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: Are there racial/ethnic differences?
- 8 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-Seminars In Medical Genetics
- Vol. 119C (1) , 19-26
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.10004
Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R2 values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Objective and subjective assessments of socioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant women.Health Psychology, 2000
- Procedure-related miscarriages and down syndrome–affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferencesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Preferences of women facing a prenatal diagnostic choice: long-term outcomes matter mostPrenatal Diagnosis, 1999
- Decisions about Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal Disorders: Perceptions of a Diverse Group of Pregnant WomenJournal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 1999
- Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: Preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Comparison of women who do and do not have amniocentesis or chorionic villus samplingThe Lancet, 1995
- Amniocentesis in sociocultural perspectiveJournal of Genetic Counseling, 1993
- ‘Collective Fictions’: Similarities in Reasons for Accepting Maternal Serum Alpha-Fetoprotein Screening among Women of Diverse Ethnic and Social Class BackgroundsFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1993
- Prenatal Screening and Its Impact on Persons with DisabilitiesFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1993
- Prenatal diagnosis for the detection of down syndrome: Why are so few eligible women tested?Prenatal Diagnosis, 1981