The growth of maize
- 1 June 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 90 (3) , 569-577
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600056100
Abstract
Summary: Total dry-matter yield of maize silage rose asymptotically as density was increased up to 17 plants/m2. Over the range 11–17 plants/m2, which is generally higher than is used in the U.K., the increase in yield was 1–1·6 t dry matter/ha which can justify the higher seed cost and although there was no adverse affect on time of maturity the risk of lodging increased at the highest density. During the harvest period whilst whole crop dry-matter percentage was rising from 23 to 28%, the ear dry-matter content rose steadily from 29 to 35%, whereas the leaf and stem dry-matter content remained essentially constant and only dried out at a later stage after a frost.Caldera 535 had a higher leaf area index and net assimilation rate than the earlier variety Julia which it outyielded by 15%. The additional yield was mainly stem tissue and the greater vegetative production caused an 11-day delay in reaching the silage stage of maturity (25% crop D.M.). NO differences occurred between density treatments and varieties in the forage quality components considered, namely percentage drymatter digestibility, modified acid-detergent fibre, crude protein and ash. Thus in U.K. conditions, total dry-matter yield exerts an overriding influence on the yields per unit area of these quality constituents. This contrasts with reports from the U.S.A. in which a reduced grain/stover ratio adversely influences silage quality.Removal of the whole ear (including husk and rachis) at an early stage in ear development resulted in a 50% reduction in the final dry-matter yield. In the earless plants, leaf area and net assimilation rate was lower, but the dry-matter content of the leaves and stem was considerably higher, and a marked purple coloration developed indicative of excess starch concentration. These results emphasize the need in maize silage not only for an adequate leaf canopy, best obtained early in the growing season by using high planting density and subsequently by using late maturing varieties, but also for sufficient sink capacity in the ear as well as in the stem fraction.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The question of grain content and forage quality in maize: comparisons between isogenic fertile and sterile plantsThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1975
- A note on the effect of genotype, density and row width on the yield and quality of forage maizeThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1975
- Plant Component Yield and Cell Contents of an Adapted and a Tropical Corn, Zea mays L.1Crop Science, 1972
- Maize Fodder—Influence of Barrenness on Yield and Quality1Crop Science, 1972
- The growth of maize. I. The effect of plant density on yield of digestible dry matter and grainThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1972
- Plant density and yield of shoot dry material in maize in EnglandThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1971
- Effect of Absence of Developing Grain on Carbohydrate Content and Senescence of Maize LeavesPlant Physiology, 1970
- Yield and quality components in maize grown for silageThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1968
- Problems involved in the cultivation of maize for fodder and ensilage. I. The choice of varietyThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1959
- Corn Plant Population In Relation To Soil ProductivityPublished by Elsevier ,1959