The cost-effectiveness of three smoking cessation programs.
- 1 February 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 77 (2) , 162-165
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.77.2.162
Abstract
This study analyzed the cost-effectiveness and distribution of costs by program stage of three smoking cessation programs: a smoking cessation class; an incentive-based quit smoking contest; and a self-help quit smoking kit. The self-help program had the lowest total cost, lowest per cent quit rate, lowest time requirement for participants, and was the most cost-effective. The most effective program, the smoking cessation class, required the most time from participants, had the highest total cost, and was the least cost-effective. The smoking contest was in-between the other two programs in total costs, per cent quit rate, and cost-effectiveness; it required the same time commitment from participants as the self-help program. These findings are interpreted within the context of community-based intervention in which the argument is made that cost-effectiveness is only one of several factors that should determine the selection of smoking cessation programs.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A framework for evaluating community-based heart disease prevention programsSocial Science & Medicine, 1986
- THE STANFORD FIVE-CITY PROJECT: DESIGN AND METHODSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Mediated smoking cessation programs in the Stanford five-city projectAddictive Behaviors, 1985
- Assessing the cost-effectiveness of preventionJournal of Community Health, 1983