Thrombotic Complications of Central Venous Catheters in Cancer Patients
- 1 April 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Oncologist
- Vol. 9 (2) , 207-216
- https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.9-2-207
Abstract
Learning Objectives: After completing this course, the reader will be able to: Describe the mechanism of thrombosis in CVCs. Explain the symptoms, signs, and sequelae of CVC thrombosis. Discuss the evidence supporting the prophylaxis of CVC thrombosis. Access and take the CME test online and receive one hour of AMA PRA category 1 credit at http://CME.TheOncologist.com Central venous catheters (CVCs), such as the tunneled catheters and the totally implanted ports, play a major role in general medicine and oncology. Aside from the complications (pneumothorax, hemorrhage) associated with their initial insertion, all of these CVCs are associated with the long-term risks of infection and thrombosis. Despite routine flushing with heparin or saline, 41% of CVCs result in thrombosis of the blood vessel, and this markedly increases the risk of infection. Only one-third of these clots are symptomatic. Within days of insertion, almost all CVCs are coated with a fibrin sheath, and within 30 days, most CVC-related thrombi arise. Aside from reducing the function of the catheter, these CVC-related thrombi can cause postphlebitic syndrome in 15%–30% of cases and pulmonary embolism in 11% (only half of which are symptomatic). Risk factors for CVC thrombosis include the type of malignancy, type of chemotherapy, type of CVC, and locations of insertion site and catheter tip, but not inherited thrombophilic risk factors. Efforts to reduce CVC thrombosis with systemic prophylactic anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin have failed. Low-dose warfarin prophylaxis remains controversial; all studies are flawed, with older studies, but not newer ones, showing benefit. Currently, less than 10% of patients with CVCs receive any systemic prophylaxis. Although its general use cannot be recommended, low-dose warfarin may be a low-risk treatment in patients with good nutrition and adequate hepatic function. Clearly, additional studies are required to substantiate the prophylactic use of low-dose warfarin. Newer anticoagulant treatments, such as pentasaccharide and direct thrombin inhibitors, need to be explored to address this major medical problem.Keywords
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ximelagatran compared with warfarin for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: rationale, objectives, and design of a pair of clinical studies and baseline patient characteristics (SPORTIF III and V)American Heart Journal, 2003
- Minidose (1 mg) warfarin as prophylaxis for central vein catheter thrombosisInternal Medicine Journal, 2002
- Longterm central venous access in gynecologic cancer patientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2000
- Die Geschichte der Injektionen - Bilder aus der Geschichte der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, dargestellt an Instrumenten aus der Sammlung im Deutschen Medizinhistorischen Museum in Ingolstadt -Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, 2000
- A prospective analysis of 949 long-term central venous access catheters for ambulatory chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancyEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 1997
- Hickman catheters: left‐sided insertion, male gender, and obesity are associated with an increased risk of complicationsAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Central Venous Catheter Clots: Incidence, Clinical Significance and Catheter Care in Patients with Hematologic MalignanciesPediatric Hematology and Oncology, 1995
- Thrombotic complications of subclavian apheresis catheters in cancer patients: Prevention with heparin infusionJournal of Clinical Apheresis, 1990
- Early Intravenous AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1990
- HISTORICAL VIGNETTESAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1974