Evaluating doctoral programs in social work: a case study

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This study attempted to evaluate the success of a doctoral program by investigating the scholarly productivity and professional activities of program graduates in relation to several variables. Graduates indicated that they were less involved in research than they wished to be and were more involved in teaching and administrative duties than they liked. Of all the variables considered, scores on the Miller Analogies Test and on the quantitative part of the Graduate Record Examination were found to be the best predictors, singly as well as in combination, of the extent to which graduates engage in research and publish their work.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: