Equivalent deficits in bone mass of the vertebral body and posterior processes in women with vertebral fractures: Implications regarding the pathogenesis of spinal osteoporosis
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Vol. 10 (12) , 2005-2010
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.5650101221
Abstract
Reduced bone mass of the spine in women with vertebral fractures is attributed to excessive trabecular bone loss from the vertebral body. However, the measurement obtained by posteroanterior (PA) scanning includes the posterior processes and the vertebral body, each comprising about 50% of the total vertebral mass. Thus, the deficit in bone mass by PA scanning may be due to deficits in one or both of these structures. We asked two questions: (1) In healthy women, is the age‐related diminution in bone mass of the vertebral body greater than the diminution at the posterior processes? (2) In women with vertebral fractures, is the deficit in bone mass at the vertebral body, the fracture site in spinal osteoporosis, greater than at the posterior processes? Bone mass of the posterior processes and vertebral body of the third lumbar vertebra was measured by lateral scanning using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA). Compared with 27 premenopausal women, deficits in 27 postmenopausal women at the posterior processes and vertebral body, respectively, were 35.9 ± 3.7 and 25.2 ± 4.1% (p < 0.05); t score, –1.5 ± 0.2 and –1.1 ± 0.2 SD (p = 0.09). Compared with the postmenopausal (age‐matched) women, deficits in 21 women with vertebral fractures at the posterior processes and vertebral body, respectively, were 22.6 ± 4.9 and 24.5 ± 8.3% (p = NS); Z score, –0.8 ± 0.2 and –0.8 ± 0.3 (p = NS). In vivo the bone mass of the vertebral body as a percentage of the whole vertebra was 45.7 ± 0.1 in premenopausal women, 48.9 ± 1.9 in postmenopausal women, 51.5 ± 1.1 in women with low bone mass but no fractures, 52.7 ± 2.4 in women with vertebral fractures, and 51.9 ± 2.5% in vitro, based on autopsy specimens from 19 postmenopausal women aged 65–95 years. The lower spinal bone density measured using PA scanning in women with spine fractures may not be due to excessive or disproportionate trabecular bone loss from the vertebral body because comparable deficits are found at the posterior processes. Whether these deficits are due to reduced peak bone mass, trabecular bone loss, cortical bone loss, or varying combinations of these mechanisms remains to be established.Keywords
Funding Information
- Austin Hospital Medical Research Foundation
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inhomogeneity in body fat distribution may result in inaccuracy in the measurement of vertebral bone massJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1995
- Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine—decubitus lateral versus anteroposterior projection in osteoporotic women: Comparison to single energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearmBone, 1995
- Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of lumbar vertebrae: Relative contribution of body and posterior elements and accuracy in relation with neutron activation analysisBone, 1992
- Biologically meaningful determinants of the in vitro strength of lumbar vertebraeBone, 1991
- Structural and geometric changes in iliac bone: Relationship to normal aging and osteoporosisJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1991
- Vertebral bone mineral density measured laterally by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometryOsteoporosis International, 1990
- Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: A new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spineJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1990
- Reduced Bone Mass in Daughters of Women with OsteoporosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- The proportion of trabecular bone in human vertebraeJournal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1987
- Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1983