Topotecan Compared With No Therapy After Response to Surgery and Carboplatin/Paclitaxel in Patients With Ovarian Cancer: Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer (MITO-1) Randomized Study
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (13) , 2635-2642
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.09.088
Abstract
Purpose: Topotecan is an active second-line treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Its efficacy as consolidation treatment after first-line standard chemotherapy is unknown. Patients and Methods: To investigate whether topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5, four cycles, every 3 weeks) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) for patients responding to standard carboplatin (area under the curve 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 administered as a 3-hour infusion in six cycles; CP), a multicenter phase III study was performed with an 80% power to detect a 50% prolongation of median PFS. Patients were registered at diagnosis and randomized after the end of CP. Results: Two hundred seventy-three patients were randomly assigned (topotecan, n = 137; observation, n = 136), with a median age of 56 years. Stage at diagnosis was advanced in three fourths of patients (stage III in 65% of patients; stage IV in 10%); after primary surgery, 46% had no residual disease and 20% were optimally debulked. After CP, 87% reached a clinical complete response, and 13% achieved a partial response. Neutropenia (grade 3/4 in 58% of the patients) and thrombocytopenia (grade 3 in 21%; grade 4 in 3%) were the most frequent toxicities attributed to topotecan. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the arms (P = .83; log-rank test): median PFS was 18.2 months in the topotecan arm and 28.4 in the control arm. Hazard ratio of progression for patients receiving topotecan was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.63) after adjustment for residual disease, interval debulking surgery, and response to CP. Conclusion: The present analysis indicates that consolidation with topotecan does not improve PFS for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who respond to initial chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intraperitoneal Radioactive Phosphorus (32P) Versus Observation After Negative Second-Look Laparotomy for Stage III Ovarian Carcinoma: A Randomized Trial of the Gynecologic Oncology GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Phase III Randomized Trial of 12 Versus 3 Months of Maintenance Paclitaxel in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Complete Response to Platinum and Paclitaxel-Based Chemotherapy: A Southwest Oncology Group and Gynecologic Oncology Group TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2003
- Tamoxifen Therapy for Ovarian Cancer in the Adjuvant and Advanced Settings: Systematic Review of the Literature and Implications for Future ResearchGynecologic Oncology, 2002
- Response and Toxicity to Topotecan in Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Cases with Small Residual Disease after First-Line Treatment with Carboplatinum and PaclitaxelGynecologic Oncology, 2001
- Whole Abdominal Radiotherapy Following Second-Look Laparotomy for Ovarian CarcinomaGynecologic Oncology, 1999
- Ten-year follow-up of ovarian cancer patients after second-look laparotomy with negative findingsObstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A Prospective Randomized Comparison of 6 and 12 Cycles of Cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, and Cisplatin in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Danish Ovarian Study Group Trial (DACOVA)Gynecologic Oncology, 1993
- Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trialsBiometrika, 1983
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958