Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement
- 31 October 1998
- Vol. 317 (7167) , 1171-1172
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1171
Abstract
Cluster randomised trials, where groups of patients rather than individuals are randomised, are increasingly being used in health services research. Randomisation by individual is inappropriate for evaluating some interventions, such as organisational changes, where it may not be feasible to randomise at the patient level. In such cases cluster randomisation at the level of the health professional or organisation is necessary. Such randomisation can also minimise the potential for contamination between treatments when trial patients are managed within the same setting. The main consequence of adopting a cluster design is that the outcome for each patient can no longer be assumed to be independent of that for any other patient (which is the case in an individually randomised trial). Patients within any one cluster are more likely to have similar outcomes. For example, the management of patients within a single general practice is more likely to be consistent …Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistics notes: The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisationBMJ, 1998
- Some Aspects of the Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization TrialsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1998
- Analysis of a trial randomised in clustersBMJ, 1998
- NHS bonds could be alternative to private finance initiative for NHSBMJ, 1997
- Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled TrialsJAMA, 1996
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statementJAMA, 1996
- Multilevel Models: Applications to Health DataJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 1996
- The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians’ patient care behaviorJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1992