On Selecting the Best Set of Regression Predictors
- 1 December 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 48 (2) , 100-103
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1979.11011719
Abstract
The three traditional methods of backward, forward, and stepwise selection of variables to be included in a “best” regression equation were compared to a method designed to maximize weight validity. With student achievement as the criterion, and aptitudinal variables manifesting considerable multicolinearity as predictors, the subset of variables selected by the traditional methods performed poorer than the one selected by the weight validity maximization method. Implications for constructing regression equations for prediction are discussed, with consideration of the weight validity maximization method recommended in crucial situations.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Computer Abstracts:Journal of Marketing Research, 1977
- A Monte Carlo evaluation of three formula estimates of cross-validated multiple correlation.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- Ridge regression: Application to nonexperimental data.Psychological Bulletin, 1977
- The Superiority of Factor Scores as PredictorsThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1977
- Selecting the best regression equation by maximizing double cross-validation correlationBehavior Research Methods, 1976
- A New Formula for Predicting the Shrinkage of the Coefficient of Multiple CorrelationThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1931