Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Open Access
- 16 March 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 140 (6) , 465-479
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-140-6-200403160-00014
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common bloodborne pathogen in the United States and is an important cause of patient morbidity and mortality, but it is unclear whether screening to identify asymptomatic infected persons is appropriate. To synthesize the evidence on risks and benefits of screening for HCV infection. MEDLINE (through February 2003), Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry (2002, Issue 2), reference lists, and experts. Controlled studies of screening and antiviral therapy and observational studies on other interventions, risk factors, accuracy of antibody testing, work-up, harms of biopsy, and long-term outcomes. Using preset criteria, the authors assessed the quality of included studies and abstracted information about settings, patients, interventions, and outcomes. There are no published trials of screening for HCV infection. Approximately 2% of U.S. adults have HCV antibodies, with the majority having chronic infection. Risk factor assessment could identify adults at substantially higher risk. Antiviral treatment can result in a sustained virologic response rate of 54% to 56%, but no trials have been done specifically in asymptomatic patients likely to be identified by screening. Data are insufficient to determine whether treatment improves long-term outcomes. There are no data to estimate the benefit from counseling or immunizations. Although risks of biopsy and treatment appear minimal or self-limited, data on other adverse effects of screening, such as labeling or anxiety, are sparse. Antiviral treatment can successfully eradicate HCV, but data on long-term outcomes in populations likely to be identified by screening are lacking. Although the yield from targeted screening, particularly in intravenous drug users, would be substantially higher than in the general population, data are inadequate to accurately weigh the overall benefits and risks of screening in otherwise healthy asymptomatic adults.Keywords
This publication has 158 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic tests for hepatitis CHepatology, 1997
- Importance of sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus in seropositive pregnant women: A case-control studyJournal of Medical Virology, 1997
- Relevance of RIBA-3 supplementary test to HCV PCR positivity and genotypes for HCV confirmation of blood donorsJournal of Medical Virology, 1996
- Demographic Determinants of Hepatitis C Virus Seroprevalence Among Blood DonorsJAMA, 1996
- Evaluation of a new automated third-generation anti-HCV enzyme immunoassayJournal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 1996
- The pathology of hepatitis C as a function of mode of transmission: Blood transfusion vs. Intravenous drug useHepatology, 1993
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Patients Attending a Clinic for Sexually Transmitted DiseasesJAMA, 1993
- Risk Factors for Hepatitis C Virus Seropositivity in Heterosexual CouplesJAMA, 1993
- Independent risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in french drinkersHepatology, 1991
- Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis†Hepatology, 1981