Selecting indicators for the quality of cardiac care at the health system level in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries
Open Access
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care
- Vol. 18 (suppl_1) , 39-44
- https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl028
Abstract
Background. Cardiovascular (CV) diseases are major causes of morbidity and death in adults in the world. Major differences have been reported in the management strategies and the outcome of CV diseases within and between countries. To better understand and address these differences, there is a need for quantitative information on patient management, outcome, and prognosis. Objective. This article describes the development of a set of quality indicators for cardiac care and summarizes work undertaken by the Cardiac Care Panel of the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. Methods. A list of 61 potential indicators was identified through a literature search, review of national measurement systems, and nomination from countries participating in the project. The Cardiac Care Panel then used a modified Delphi process developed originally by RAND to select indicators. Panel members individually rated each indicator on a scale of 1–9 for scientific soundness and importance. All indicators receiving scores of 7 or more for both importance and soundness were included in the final set. Results. Seventeen cardiac indicators were selected for the final set of indicators from the following areas: acute coronary syndromes, cardiac interventions, secondary prevention, and congestive heart failure. Conclusions. The final set of 17 indicators selected by the Cardiac Care Panel constitutes a comprehensive set of measures for the most relevant domains of CV care. Nevertheless, gaps remain in the area of primary prevention and in particular in areas with rapidly changing technology and improving treatment options.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short-term and 5-year outcome after primary isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery: results of risk stratification in a bilocation centerEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- Determinants of operative mortality following primary coronary artery bypass surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002
- The effects of contemporary use of coronary stents on in-hospital mortalityJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2001
- The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 1999
- Factors influencing the time to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Time to Thrombolysis Substudy of the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-1Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1997
- Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)The Lancet, 1994
- Effect of Enalapril on Survival in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions and Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- MEDICAL SCIENCE GISSI-2: A factorial randomised trial of alteplase versus streptokinase and heparin versus no heparin among 12 490 patients with acute myocardial infarctionThe Lancet, 1990
- Effects of Enalapril on Mortality in Severe Congestive Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- A randomized, controlled trial of aspirin in persons recovered from myocardial infarctionPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1980