PHREATIC VERSUS VADOSE METEORIC DIAGENESIS OF LIMESTONES: EVIDENCE FROM A FOSSIL WATER TABLE
- 1 January 1970
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sedimentology
- Vol. 14 (3-4) , 175-185
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1970.tb00191.x
Abstract
SUMMARY: The Middle Pleistocene Belmont Formation of Bermuda consists in part of beach‐dune biocalcarenites which underwent intense contemporaneous cementation and diagenesis. The beach deposits were contemporaneously cemented by fibrous isophacous cement to form beachrock, whereas previously deposited eolianites further inland underwent intense meteoric phreatic diagenesis, resulting in coarse‐grained cementation and stabilization of most of the metastable components of the rock. Above the Belmont water table, vadose diagenesis was relatively ineffective in cementing and altering the biocalcarenites. Phreatic meteoric diagenesis is interpreted to be a very rapid process, relative to vadose meteoric diagenesis, and to result in a much coarser‐grained sparite.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- LATE PLEISTOCENE DIAGENESIS AND DOLOMITIZATION, NORTH JAMAICA1Sedimentology, 1970
- Subaerial Diagenesis of Carbonate Sediments: Efficiency of the Solution-Reprecipitation ProcessScience, 1968
- Pleistocene History of BermudaGSA Bulletin, 1967
- Variations in the O18/O16 and C13/C12 Ratios of Diagenetically Altered Limestones in the Bermuda IslandsThe Journal of Geology, 1964
- BERMUDA: A PARTIALLY DROWNED, LATE MATURE, PLEISTOCENE KARSTGSA Bulletin, 1960